Patch for BT issue on Snowball

[Thomas ESPERSSON]

Hi Kejun!
Do we really need Android specific updates to get this working? The driver issues should not be dependent on Android (or Ubuntu).

Regarding the changes in board-mop500-pins.c, I thought the problem with GPIO and ALT-A mode was solved already, or was that only applied to the 3.2 kernel and that is why you had to fix it again on the 3.1 version that you tested with?

BR Thomas


-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe LANGLAIS 
Sent: den 29 februari 2012 13:05
To: Kalle Vahlman
Cc: Kejun Zhou; kernel at igloocommunity.org; lee.jones at linaro.org; Thomas ESPERSSON
Subject: Re: Patch for BT issue on Snowball

Hi,

I temporarily pushed this patch on stable-android-ux500-3.1 IK branch only.
But, I can't applied it as it is on other IK branches, this
patch has to be completely reworked.
First, why android LEB is based on this branch, this branch has a broken 
mali, BT etc...?
The right branch for Android 3.1 kernel is stable-android-ux500-3.1-mali-v9.

This patch is Android specific as mentionned by Kalle (wakelock), so 
can't be applied on Ubuntu branches.
The u8500_android_defconfig has too many modifications not relative to 
cg2900, which may break other features

Have to split it into 4 patches:
one for defconfig => core topic,
another one for arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-pins.c => mach-plat topic,
another one for drivers/staging/cg2900/* => cg2900 topic
and the rest => other topic

This patch must be rebase on at least stable 3.2 branches, in 2 version 
one generic and one Android specific
and ideally on integration-linux-ux500 & integration-android-ux500
Kejun have you some time for reworking your patch on 3.2?

BR,
Philippe

On 02/29/2012 08:16 AM, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
> 2012/2/29 Kejun Zhou<kejun.zhou at linaro.org>:
>> Hi
>>
>> This is my patch for the BT issue on Snowball.
>>
>>
>> For these bugs:
>>
>> #860588 Snowball: Bluetooth Turn ON Fails.
>>
>> #918643 Intermittent: cg2900 fails to start
> I was going to test, but firstly the changes are Android-specific
> (unguarded wakelock usage) and secondly they don't apply to
> stable-android-ux500-3.2 (the current released kernel), to
> integration-android-ux500 (the CI android branch) nor to cg2900 (the
> topic branch for cg2900) on Igloo Kernel.
>
> What kernel/branch are these made against?
>